#REGULATORY SCRUTINY HOW TO#

Opinions issued by the Board on impact assessments can be ‘positive’, ‘positive with reservations’, or ‘negative’.Ī positive/positive with reservations opinion is needed from the Board for an initiative accompanied by an impact assessment to be tabled for adoption by the Commission.

The Board does not decide on initiatives or on policy objectives: that role belongs to the College of Commissioners.

#REGULATORY SCRUTINY HOW TO#

The Board opinions contain recommendations for Commission services on how to improve draft reports. major retrospective evaluations of a single policy or law, and fitness checks of multiple policies and laws.impact assessments, developed during the preparation of new initiatives.The Board examines and issues opinions on the quality of draft reports relating to: The Board’s role is to provide quality assurance of Commission impact assessments, fitness checks, and major evaluations to the political level of the Commission, enabling it to take decisions on the basis of best available information and stakeholders’ views. Regulatory Scrutiny Board’s Business Plan The Board also provides cross-cutting advice on better regulation policy to the Commission’s Secretariat-General. The Board reviews and issues opinions and recommendations on all the Commission's draft impact assessments, fitness checks, and on major evaluations of existing legislation. The Board’s work on impact assessments strengthens subsequent evaluations, and vice versa (Figure 2). It provides central quality control and support for Commission impact assessments and evaluations at early stages of the legislative process (Figure 1). The Regulatory Scrutiny Board is an independent body within the Commission that advises the College of Commissioners.

Regulatory scrutiny